Headquartered within steps of the USPTO with an affiliate office in Tokyo, Oblon is one of the largest law firms in the United States focused exclusively on intellectual property law.
1968
Norman Oblon with Stanley Fisher and Marvin Spivak launched what was to become Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP, one of the nation's leading full-service intellectual property law firms.
Outside the US, we service companies based in Japan, France, Germany, Italy, Saudi Arabia, and farther corners of the world. Our culturally aware attorneys speak many languages, including Japanese, French, German, Mandarin, Korean, Russian, Arabic, Farsi, Chinese.
Oblon's professionals provide industry-leading IP legal services to many of the world's most admired innovators and brands.
From the minute you walk through our doors, you'll become a valuable part of a team that fosters a culture of innovation, client service and collegiality.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued final rules implementing the inventor's oath or declaration provisions of the America Invents Act (AIA) on August 14, 2012.
Les Nouvelles - Licensing Executives Society International (LESI)
November 11, 2024
October 9-10, 2024 in Tokyo and Osaka
October 1 and 3, 2024
Alexandria, Va. – Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C. is pleased to announce that Arthur I. Neustadt, head of the firm's Litigation Department and a member of its Board of Directors, has been named to the 2006 list of "The Best Lawyers in America" by Best Lawyers. Published biennially since 1983, "The Best Lawyers in America" is widely regarded as the preeminent referral guide to the legal profession in the United States.
Alexandria, Va. – Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C. is pleased to announce that Frank J. West and Akihiro Yamazaki have been elected as partners to the Firm. Additionally, the firm elevated four associates to senior associate level.
For Immediate Release September 22, 2005 Alexandria, Va. – A jury in U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina in Greenville has awarded $90,000 in damages to DyStar Textilfarben GmbH & Co. Deutschland KG, a German dyestuff and chemical manufacturer due to patent infringement by C.H. Patrick Co., Inc. and Bann Quimica LTDA. DyStar is a client of Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C. This is the second jury trial won by the Oblon, Spivak firm this year.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 22, 2005 Alexandria, Va. – Gerald J. Mossinghoff, senior counsel to Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C., has been named again to the Patent Public Advisory Committee (PPAC) by U.S. Commerce Secretary Carlos M. Gutierrez. Mossinghoff will serve an additional three-year term on the Statutory Advisory Committee, which was created by the 1999 American Inventors Protection Act to advise the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on the agency's operations, including its goals, performance, budget and user fees.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE August 17, 2005 Ricoh Prevails in Patent Infringement Case Richard Kelly of Oblon, Spivak Obtains Summary Judgment for Ricoh Alexandria, Va. – A district judge in the U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey, has issued a partial summary judgment ruling that patents held by photocopying machine manufacturer Ricoh Corp. are infringed and not invalid. The ruling held that defendants General Plastics Industrial Co., Ltd., Katun Corporation and Nashua Corporation are liable for infringement of six Ricoh patents based upon their manufacture and sale of toner bottles for use in Ricoh photocopiers.
In a closely watched case in the heart pacemaker industry involving an important treatment for congestive heart failure, Chief Judge Sue L. Robinson of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware upheld a Mirowski Family Ventures ("MFV") patent licensed to Guidant Corporation and challenged by Medtronic, Inc. Trial counsel for MFA was Arthur Neustadt of the Oblon, Spivak firm.
The July 26, 2005 Statement of Hon. General J. Mossinghoff, Senior Counsel, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C. before the Subcommittee on Intellectual Property - Committee on the Judiciary - United States Senate
A U.S. district judge in the District of Massachusetts has found that Festo Corporation did not prove SMC Corp. infringed its patents under the doctrine of equivalents in a bench trial on the landmark case.
On 27 June 2005, the Second Circuit issued its decision in the 1-800 Contacts v. WhenU.com case, involving trademark infringement based on pop-up advertisements. Finding it unnecessary to reach likelihood of confusion analysis, the court held as a matter of law: "WhenU does not ‘use' 1-800's trademarks within the meaning of the Lanham Act . . . when it (1) includes 1-800's website address, which is almost identical to 1-800's trademark, in an unpublished directory of terms that trigger delivery of WhenU's contextually relevant advertising to C-users; or (2) causes separate, branded pop-up ads to appear on a C-user's computer screen either above, below, or along the bottom edge of the 1-800 website window."
Alexandria, Va. – Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C. is pleased to announce that the Firm is a #1 law firm for intellectual property in Northern Virginia in the Chambers USA Guide of America's Leading Lawyers for Business. Additionally, Arthur I. Neustadt and Charles L. Gholz share a #1 ranking for leading intellectual property attorneys in the state.